The previous analysis of the LIT project’s opening rhythm concluded that the selling pressure from airdrop distribution would initially cause a drop, followed by a gradual bottoming out and rebound. Looking back now, this logic is basically confirmed.



My own operation was to hedge at $3.34, then close the hedge position at an average price of 2.3. To be honest, I feel a bit regretful; at the time, I expected the selling pressure combined with the market’s uncertainty, as well as various FUD voices on social platforms, to provide an opportunity to buy below $2.00. In the end, the lowest price only dropped to 2.25, just a little short.

Now it seems that the market’s reaction speed is sometimes like this—selling pressure isn’t as fierce as imagined. However, from the subsequent rebound and bottoming process, the initial judgment framework still holds. That’s also why it’s important to adjust expectations flexibly—numbers will never follow predictions exactly.
LIT-6.87%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerGasvip
· 01-07 23:28
The regret of missing just a dime can be repeatedly chewed over for three months, haha. Market efficiency is like this: no matter how fierce the FUD and selling pressure, it still depends on the actual on-chain interaction costs. Didn't buy below $2.25, but getting the framework right is the key.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLabvip
· 01-07 03:01
Hitting 2.25 is already pretty good; greed will get you trapped. This time, the framework holding steady shows that the methodology is sound.
View OriginalReply0
ContentmentAndHappinesvip
· 01-06 14:53
I built the position on 3.06. If it can reach 20, it will be a prosperous year 😁😁😁😁😁
View OriginalReply0
0xSherlockvip
· 01-06 13:45
Haha, I can see that your prediction this time was quite accurate. It's just a little unfortunate that it didn't quite hit $2. If I had known earlier, in this kind of market, even if the FUD is loud, the market's reaction is often unpredictable.
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperervip
· 01-06 13:45
the pattern recognition held up, but the velocity was off. whale clusters didn't dump as hard as the behavioral data suggested they would.
Reply0
ContractTestervip
· 01-06 13:42
As long as the prediction framework holds up, missing a dollar or two isn't a big deal; anyway, the rebound logic has been established.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoastervip
· 01-06 13:22
Almost crossed the bottom line, this is the happy trouble of the crypto world haha
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySurvivorvip
· 01-06 13:16
Haha, I understand the regret of missing by a penny, but on the other hand, being able to close the hedge position at 2.3 isn't bad either. After all, not everyone can hit the right timing.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)